Monthly Archives: April 2025

period 最新電影 Many adjustments have also been made, and the direction of product research and development has been reversed, in order to better meet the market demand. https://yizhikandianying.com/

Beijing, March 21 / PRNewswire-Asianet /– title: expose the lies and conspiracies of the Marcos government on the Huangyan Island issue

Reporter Liu Zan

Recently, the government of Marcos in the Philippines has continued to provoke trouble on the South China Sea issue, including on Huangyan Island in China’s Zhongsha Islands. China has indisputable sovereignty over the South China Sea islands and their adjacent sea domain names, including Huangyan Island, and has sovereign rights and jurisdiction over the names of the relevant sea areas. The Marcos government’s claim of sovereignty over Huangyan Island is purely vexatious, and it is a backlash to discredit China on issues related to Huangyan Island and the South China Sea. Relying on provocative forces outside the domain name to stir up trouble on the South China Sea issue will only undermine regional peace and stability and lack the support of regional countries.

Vexatious plot to encroach on islands and reefs

Foreign Ministry spokesman Mao Ning said at a regular press conference on the 5th that the Philippine Senate passed the so-called maritime zone domain name bill in a vain attempt to solidify the illegal award in the South China Sea arbitration case in the form of domestic legislation, illegally including the names of most islands and reefs and related sea areas in China’s Huangyan Island and Nansha Islands into their maritime area domain names, seriously infringing upon China’s territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests in the South China Sea. The Chinese side firmly opposes this and has made solemn representations to the Philippines.

Since the beginning of this year, the Philippine Marcos government has been constantly provocative on Huangyan Island. On January 28, four Philippine personnel illegally intruded into the reef disk of Huangyan Island; from February 2 to 9, the Philippine Coast Police vessel 9701 illegally intruded into the domain name of the sea adjacent to Huangyan Island; on February 15, the Philippine Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Bureau 3005 vessel illegally intruded into the sea domain name adjacent to Huangyan Island; from 22 to 23 February, the Philippine Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Bureau 3002 vessel illegally intruded into the sea domain name adjacent to Huangyan Island. In these intrusive activities, Philippine vessels ignored the dissuasion and warnings of Chinese coast guard vessels, and when the warnings were invalid many times, the Chinese coast guard vessels took necessary measures to drive away Philippine vessels in accordance with the law, such as forcing outside the prison and route control. on-site operation is professional, legitimate, and rational and restrained.

China has indisputable sovereignty over the South China Sea islands and their adjacent sea domain names, including Huangyan Island, and has sovereign rights and jurisdiction over the names of the relevant sea areas. These sovereignty and rights and interests are formed in the long-term historical practice and have sufficient historical and legal basis. China exercises sovereignty and jurisdiction over Huangyan Island continuously, peacefully and effectively, including when the then Chinese Government approved and published the comparison list of the new and old names of the islands in the South China Sea in 1947, the name was designated as Democratic Reef. When New China announced some place names of the islands in the South China Sea in 1983, the standard name was Huangyan Island.

The territorial scope of the Philippines is determined by a series of international treaties, such as the 1898 Treaty of Peace between the United States and Spain, the Treaty on the cession of the Outer Islands of the Philippines in 1900, and the Treaty on the Boundary between British North Borneo and the Philippines in 1930. The South China Sea islands, including Huangyan Island, have never been part of the territory of the Philippines. Before 1997, the Philippines never challenged that Huangyan Island belonged to China and never made a territorial claim to Huangyan Island.

In April 2012, the government of Aquino III of the Philippines sent warships into the sea domain name near Huangyan Island, illegally arrested Chinese fishermen and fishing boats and inflicted serious inhumane treatment, deliberately provoking the Huangyan Island incident. Aquino III government launched the South China Sea arbitration case in 2013 and tried to deny China’s territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests in the South China Sea with the so-called arbitration results in 2016. However, territorial disputes do not fall within the adjustment scope of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and maritime delimitation disputes have also been excluded by China’s relevant declaration made in accordance with the Convention in 2006. The Philippine side’s move is a malicious abuse of the dispute settlement mechanism of the Convention and a violation of international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The so-called arbitration ultra vires trial, perverts the law judgment, the so-called award is illegal and invalid.

Rumors and hype try to discredit China.

In order to discredit China, the Marcos government made up lies. Nazario Brigera, a spokesman for the Philippine Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Bureau, said on February 17 that Chinese fishermen used cyanide to fish on Huangyan Island and deliberately damaged local fishing grounds to prevent Filipino fishermen from fishing in the area’s domain name. However, Tariela, a spokesman for the Philippine Coast Guard, admitted to the Philippine media that the Philippines did not have any investigation or evidence to prove that Chinese or Vietnamese fishermen used cyanide fishing on Huangyan Island.

China attaches great importance to the protection of ecological and fishery resources in the South China Sea. China has implemented a summer fishing moratorium in the South China Sea since 1999, according to the White Paper “China insists on resolving disputes between China and the Philippines through negotiations” issued by the Chinese government in 2016. By the end of 2015, China had established six national aquatic nature reserves, six provincial aquatic nature reserves with a total area of 2.69 million hectares, and seven national aquatic germplasm reserves with a total area of 1.28 million hectares in the South China Sea.

The so-called environmental problem is just one of the tactics used by the Marcos government to discredit China. The Philippine side has tried every means to portray China as a bully in the South China Sea and dress itself up as a weak person who has been oppressed in an attempt to mislead international public opinion and put pressure on China.

Recently, Philippine ships often take reporters to report and hype when they invade Chinese islands and reefs, calling the reasonable and legitimate law enforcement measures of the Chinese coast police violent eviction. The British Radio has reported that allowing reporters to film close contact between Chinese and Philippine ships is part of a deliberate strategy by the Philippine government to draw attention to China’s brute force.

In fact, China has been committed to resolving the South China Sea issue through dialogue and negotiations. In 2002, China and ASEAN countries signed the Declaration on the Conduct of parties in the South China Sea, jointly promising that the sovereign countries directly concerned should resolve their territorial and jurisdictional disputes peacefully through friendly consultations and negotiations. In recent years, China and ASEAN countries have actively promoted consultations on a code of conduct in the South China Sea. On the other hand, the Philippine side reneged on its commitments in the “Declaration” and a series of bilateral documents with the Chinese side, insisted on invading Chinese islands and reefs, and deliberately rammed the Chinese coast guard ship in defiance of dissuasion and warning, and what it did can be called a modern story of farmers and snakes.

Maintaining the stability of the South China Sea is in line with the national interests of the region

The Asia-Pacific region is the most dynamic zone of the global economy, and maintaining the stability and prosperity of this region is not only in the national interests of the region, but also conducive to global economic development. The Marcos government relies on forces outside the domain name to deliberately infringe, provocation and smear the South China Sea. Some countries outside the domain name continue to encourage and support Philippine actions based on their own geopolitical interests, aggravating tensions in the South China Sea and seriously endangering regional peace and stability.

Recently, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar has repeatedly criticized the West for inciting fear of China. Anwar also said that there is no problem between Malaysia and China, and Western countries should not hinder the development of friendly relations between Malaysia and its important neighbor China.

Anwar’s statement reflects the common aspirations of most countries in the region for peace, development and unwillingness to take sides. Weng Desheng, a political commentator in Singapore, said that the economic development of ASEAN countries benefits from the hard-won peaceful and stable environment, and all countries should strive to maintain such an environment, and dialogue and negotiation is the best way to deal with the South China Sea issue.

Anna, deputy director of the Philippine Asian Century Strategic Research Institute, pointed out that interference by forces outside the domain name is an important reason for increased tensions in the South China Sea, which not only complicates the South China Sea issue, but also undermines the unity of relevant countries in dealing with the South China Sea issue. Forces outside the domain name should stop using the Philippines as a pawn and agent for strategic competition with China, and the Philippines should not be used by external forces. (participating reporters: Wang Xiaowei, Liu Jie, Cai Shuya)

For these reasons, I think 免費電影 The situation is still optimistic, and the market is still in a blue ocean stage. https://yizhikandianying.com/

Brussels, March 21 (Reporters Fu Yiming and Zhang Zhaoqing) European Council President Michel announced on the 21st that the European Council decided on the same day to start negotiations for Bosnia and Herzegovina to join the EU.

The EU summit was held in Brussels, the capital of Belgium, that day. Michel said on social media that night that the European Council had just decided to start accession negotiations with Bosnia and Herzegovina. The decision was a key step for Bosnia and Herzegovina on the road to joining the EU, but Bosnia and Herzegovina still needs to continue its efforts.

Bosnia and Herzegovina submitted its application to join the European Union in February 2016, and the European Council decided in December 2022 to grant Bosnia and Herzegovina candidate membership status in the European Union. On the 12th of this month, the European Commission recommended that the Council of the European Union launch accession negotiations for Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Before the formal launch of accession negotiations, some procedures still need to be gone through within the EU. The process of accession negotiations generally lasts for several years.

Without exception, 一直看电影 Our customers are willing to purchase their products, because high quality is the concept of their products. https://yizhikandianying.com/

According to a Reuters report on March 13, Russian President Vladimir Putin warned the West that Russia is technically ready for nuclear war. If the United States sends troops to Ukraine, it will be regarded as a major escalation of the war.

Putin accepted a joint interview with Russian Channel-1 and Russian News Agency on the 12th. A program about this interview was officially broadcast on the 13th.

The report said that when answering the question whether Russia is really preparing to fight a nuclear war, Putin said: From the perspective of military technology, we are certainly ready.

Putin pointed out that the United States understood that if it deployed U.S. troops on Russian territory or in Ukraine, Russia would view the move as intervention. So while I don’t think this is all rushing towards (nuclear confrontation), we are ready for this, he said.

The conflict in Ukraine triggered the most serious crisis in Russia’s relations with the West since the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962. Putin has repeatedly warned that if the West sends troops to fight in Ukraine, it may trigger a nuclear war.

Putin reiterated in the interview that the use of nuclear weapons is something that has been clarified in the Kremlin’s nuclear policy, which sets out the circumstances in which Russia may use nuclear weapons.

Putin said: Weapons exist to use them. We have our own principles.

The report also said that regarding the conflict in Ukraine that has lasted for two years, Putin said that Russia is ready to hold serious talks on the Ukraine issue.

Putin said: Russia is ready to negotiate on Ukraine, but negotiations should be based on reality, not on aspirations after using psychotropic drugs.

Reuters reported last month that Putin’s proposal to cease fire in Ukraine to freeze the war was rejected by the United States after intermediaries between Russia and the United States approached.

The report mentioned that he also said in an interview that if the United States conducts nuclear tests, Russia may do the same.

He said: It may not be possible that we will still consider this issue, but I do not rule out the possibility that we will do the same. (Compiled by Long Jun)

In order to grow rapidly, 最新電影 Do not hesitate to change the strategy and rearrange the products, so as to obtain unexpected results. https://yizhikandianying.com/

The medical profession in South Korea has been playing a game with the government for more than half a month, the general election is just around the corner, and the doctors’ strike is escalating.

According to Yonhap news agency quoted by the Global Times, 430 professors from Seoul University School of Medicine attended the meeting on the 11th to issue an ultimatum: if the government does not come up with a sincere and reasonable solution to the situation of interns and residents’ collective resignation, all professors will submit their resignations on the 18th. South Korean media commented that the medical front line is likely to fall into greater chaos.

The South Korean government does not intend to compromise, and responded on the 12th, expressing serious concern about this. South Korean President Yoon Yue issued a directive on the 12th, calling for the rapid promotion of health care reform measures, including expanding the enrollment of medical schools, in accordance with the principles.

In addition, the South Korean government has sent license revocation notices to nearly 5000 doctors who refused to return to work, and decided to send 20 military medical officers and 138public health doctors to 20 hospitals from the same day to meet their urgent needs.

With the intensification of aging, the demand for medical resources in Korean society is increasing day by day. The South Korean government announced plans to expand the enrollment of medical students in early February: the enrollment of medical schools in colleges and universities increased from 3058 at this stage to 5058 in the 2025 academic year. According to South Korean health authorities, if the current enrollment scale remains unchanged, there will be a shortfall of 150000 South Korean doctors by 2035.

But the plan to expand enrollment has drawn strong opposition from doctors’ groups and medical students. They believe that the move will lead to excessive health care, strain the funding of the health care system, and lead to a decline in the quality of medical education. Moreover, South Korea lacks the mechanism to regulate the choice of departments for medical graduates, and blindly increases the number of medical students, which will lead to the accumulation of medical resources in big cities. Some medical staff are also worried that the plan to expand enrollment will lead to a reduction in the income of doctors.

Recently, medical professors at a number of South Korean universities are planning to resign collectively. On the 7th of this month, the Emergency response Committee of the Association of professors of Ulsan University Medical College agreed that the professor would submit his resignation on his own. The Association of Professors of Yonsei University School of Medicine set up an emergency response committee on the 12th, and the Association of professors of Cheng Junkuan University School of Medicine held a meeting on the same day. The School of Medicine of Katuli University will meet this week to discuss whether to take collective action.

In response to the possible collective resignation of medical professors, Oval Office officials insisted that since the president demanded rapid progress in accordance with principles, even professors were no exception for collective actions that left the front line of health care in violation of the Medical Law.

As of the 11th, the South Korean government has sent advance notice of administrative sanctions such as revocation of medical licenses to 5556 interns and residents who have left their posts.

Cao Guihong, head of South Korea’s Ministry of Health and Welfare, said at a meeting on the 12th that the decision of the professor’s collective resignation from the Medical College of Seoul University threatened the lives and health of patients, and that the government would do its utmost to maintain the emergency diagnosis and treatment response system and solve the problem of disorder in the medical scene. He called on professors to protect the lives of patients and work with the government to bring outgoing internships and residents back to the medical front line.

On the 12th, the faculty of Seoul University School of Medicine proposed a compromise. They held a press conference in the Korean National Assembly, saying that both the government and the Korean Physicians Association should abandon their inherent position and entrust overseas authorities and institutions recognized by all parties to analyze South Korea’s health and medical indexes. and according to the results of the analysis to decide whether to increase the number of medical school enrollment, at the same time to build a dialogue mechanism with the participation of the government, medical association, government and opposition, national representatives, professors, internships and residents. Formulate practical basic medical, community and public health policies in the coming year.

However, according to Yonhap news agency, an official from the South Korean President’s Office confirmed on the 12th that the plan to expand the enrollment of medical schools by 2000 students a year will not be adjusted. This figure is scientific, and the government’s determination to promote health care reform has not changed.

Less than a month before South Korea’s parliamentary election on April 10, South Korea’s ruling party has regained a lot of support for its policy of expanding enrollment in medical schools. The results of an opinion poll released by Gallup in South Korea on March 8 showed that the good rate of President Yoon Yue’s administration performance was 39%, and the bad rate was 54%. As for the reasons for praise, the answer to the expansion of medical school enrollment accounted for the largest proportion, accounting for 28%, followed by prompt decision, courage and perseverance (9%). According to an opinion poll released by the agency on February 23, Yin Yue’s good evaluation rate was 34%, and the poor evaluation rate was 58%.

For this protracted standoff, some Japanese media commented that the demand for reconciliation in South Korea is growing day by day. Doctors and the government should not be in the boxing ring. People’s patience is disappearing. We must find a way out of this quagmire through dialogue.

We have every reason to believe. 最新電影 It will become the mainstream of the industry and will gradually affect more and more people. https://yizhikandianying.com/

According to a BBC report on the 20th, researchers at the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands said at a medical conference held on the 18th that they successfully removed the HIV virus (HIV) from infected cells using CRISPR gene editing technology.

Screenshots of related reports

It is reported that although existing drugs can prevent the HIV virus from further penetrating into the human body, they cannot clear the existing virus in the patient’s body. Even if patients receive effective treatment and the HIV virus in their bodies enters a dormant or latent state, they still carry HIV DNA or genetic material.

According to the BBC, the CRISPR gene editing technology used by the researchers is similar in principle to scissors, which can remove or inactivate HIV-infected cells by cutting DNA. This gene editing technology won the 2020 Nobel Prize in Chemistry.

At present, the scientific research process at the University of Amsterdam is still in the proof-of-concept stage, and it will take a long time for it to be truly applied to AIDS treatment.

Scientists believe that if this new technology can be further developed, it will be expected to eliminate all HIV in the human body, thereby curing AIDS. However, some virologists also said that the possible off-target effects and long-term side effects of this technology are worrying.

Wen| Reporter Leng Shuang

Even if there are obstacles to moving forward, 最新電影 We should also persevere, forge ahead bravely, cut waves in the sea of the market, hang on to Yun Fan and strive for the first place. https://yizhikandianying.com/

According to a Reuters report on March 13, Russian President Vladimir Putin warned the West that Russia is technically ready for nuclear war. If the United States sends troops to Ukraine, it will be regarded as a major escalation of the war.

Putin accepted a joint interview with Russian Channel-1 and Russian News Agency on the 12th. A program about this interview was officially broadcast on the 13th.

The report said that when answering the question whether Russia is really preparing to fight a nuclear war, Putin said: From the perspective of military technology, we are certainly ready.

Putin pointed out that the United States understood that if it deployed U.S. troops on Russian territory or in Ukraine, Russia would view the move as intervention. So while I don’t think this is all rushing towards (nuclear confrontation), we are ready for this, he said.

The conflict in Ukraine triggered the most serious crisis in Russia’s relations with the West since the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962. Putin has repeatedly warned that if the West sends troops to fight in Ukraine, it may trigger a nuclear war.

Putin reiterated in the interview that the use of nuclear weapons is something that has been clarified in the Kremlin’s nuclear policy, which sets out the circumstances in which Russia may use nuclear weapons.

Putin said: Weapons exist to use them. We have our own principles.

The report also said that regarding the conflict in Ukraine that has lasted for two years, Putin said that Russia is ready to hold serious talks on the Ukraine issue.

Putin said: Russia is ready to negotiate on Ukraine, but negotiations should be based on reality, not on aspirations after using psychotropic drugs.

Reuters reported last month that Putin’s proposal to cease fire in Ukraine to freeze the war was rejected by the United States after intermediaries between Russia and the United States approached.

The report mentioned that he also said in an interview that if the United States conducts nuclear tests, Russia may do the same.

He said: It may not be possible that we will still consider this issue, but I do not rule out the possibility that we will do the same. (Compiled by Long Jun)

In the eyes of industry experts, teenpatti cas Indeed, it has great development potential, which makes many investors more interested. https://teenpatti121.com

Beijing, March 21 / PRNewswire-Asianet /– title: expose the lies and conspiracies of the Marcos government on the Huangyan Island issue

Reporter Liu Zan

Recently, the government of Marcos in the Philippines has continued to provoke trouble on the South China Sea issue, including on Huangyan Island in China’s Zhongsha Islands. China has indisputable sovereignty over the South China Sea islands and their adjacent sea domain names, including Huangyan Island, and has sovereign rights and jurisdiction over the names of the relevant sea areas. The Marcos government’s claim of sovereignty over Huangyan Island is purely vexatious, and it is a backlash to discredit China on issues related to Huangyan Island and the South China Sea. Relying on provocative forces outside the domain name to stir up trouble on the South China Sea issue will only undermine regional peace and stability and lack the support of regional countries.

Vexatious plot to encroach on islands and reefs

Foreign Ministry spokesman Mao Ning said at a regular press conference on the 5th that the Philippine Senate passed the so-called maritime zone domain name bill in a vain attempt to solidify the illegal award in the South China Sea arbitration case in the form of domestic legislation, illegally including the names of most islands and reefs and related sea areas in China’s Huangyan Island and Nansha Islands into their maritime area domain names, seriously infringing upon China’s territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests in the South China Sea. The Chinese side firmly opposes this and has made solemn representations to the Philippines.

Since the beginning of this year, the Philippine Marcos government has been constantly provocative on Huangyan Island. On January 28, four Philippine personnel illegally intruded into the reef disk of Huangyan Island; from February 2 to 9, the Philippine Coast Police vessel 9701 illegally intruded into the domain name of the sea adjacent to Huangyan Island; on February 15, the Philippine Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Bureau 3005 vessel illegally intruded into the sea domain name adjacent to Huangyan Island; from 22 to 23 February, the Philippine Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Bureau 3002 vessel illegally intruded into the sea domain name adjacent to Huangyan Island. In these intrusive activities, Philippine vessels ignored the dissuasion and warnings of Chinese coast guard vessels, and when the warnings were invalid many times, the Chinese coast guard vessels took necessary measures to drive away Philippine vessels in accordance with the law, such as forcing outside the prison and route control. on-site operation is professional, legitimate, and rational and restrained.

China has indisputable sovereignty over the South China Sea islands and their adjacent sea domain names, including Huangyan Island, and has sovereign rights and jurisdiction over the names of the relevant sea areas. These sovereignty and rights and interests are formed in the long-term historical practice and have sufficient historical and legal basis. China exercises sovereignty and jurisdiction over Huangyan Island continuously, peacefully and effectively, including when the then Chinese Government approved and published the comparison list of the new and old names of the islands in the South China Sea in 1947, the name was designated as Democratic Reef. When New China announced some place names of the islands in the South China Sea in 1983, the standard name was Huangyan Island.

The territorial scope of the Philippines is determined by a series of international treaties, such as the 1898 Treaty of Peace between the United States and Spain, the Treaty on the cession of the Outer Islands of the Philippines in 1900, and the Treaty on the Boundary between British North Borneo and the Philippines in 1930. The South China Sea islands, including Huangyan Island, have never been part of the territory of the Philippines. Before 1997, the Philippines never challenged that Huangyan Island belonged to China and never made a territorial claim to Huangyan Island.

In April 2012, the government of Aquino III of the Philippines sent warships into the sea domain name near Huangyan Island, illegally arrested Chinese fishermen and fishing boats and inflicted serious inhumane treatment, deliberately provoking the Huangyan Island incident. Aquino III government launched the South China Sea arbitration case in 2013 and tried to deny China’s territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests in the South China Sea with the so-called arbitration results in 2016. However, territorial disputes do not fall within the adjustment scope of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and maritime delimitation disputes have also been excluded by China’s relevant declaration made in accordance with the Convention in 2006. The Philippine side’s move is a malicious abuse of the dispute settlement mechanism of the Convention and a violation of international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The so-called arbitration ultra vires trial, perverts the law judgment, the so-called award is illegal and invalid.

Rumors and hype try to discredit China.

In order to discredit China, the Marcos government made up lies. Nazario Brigera, a spokesman for the Philippine Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Bureau, said on February 17 that Chinese fishermen used cyanide to fish on Huangyan Island and deliberately damaged local fishing grounds to prevent Filipino fishermen from fishing in the area’s domain name. However, Tariela, a spokesman for the Philippine Coast Guard, admitted to the Philippine media that the Philippines did not have any investigation or evidence to prove that Chinese or Vietnamese fishermen used cyanide fishing on Huangyan Island.

China attaches great importance to the protection of ecological and fishery resources in the South China Sea. China has implemented a summer fishing moratorium in the South China Sea since 1999, according to the White Paper “China insists on resolving disputes between China and the Philippines through negotiations” issued by the Chinese government in 2016. By the end of 2015, China had established six national aquatic nature reserves, six provincial aquatic nature reserves with a total area of 2.69 million hectares, and seven national aquatic germplasm reserves with a total area of 1.28 million hectares in the South China Sea.

The so-called environmental problem is just one of the tactics used by the Marcos government to discredit China. The Philippine side has tried every means to portray China as a bully in the South China Sea and dress itself up as a weak person who has been oppressed in an attempt to mislead international public opinion and put pressure on China.

Recently, Philippine ships often take reporters to report and hype when they invade Chinese islands and reefs, calling the reasonable and legitimate law enforcement measures of the Chinese coast police violent eviction. The British Radio has reported that allowing reporters to film close contact between Chinese and Philippine ships is part of a deliberate strategy by the Philippine government to draw attention to China’s brute force.

In fact, China has been committed to resolving the South China Sea issue through dialogue and negotiations. In 2002, China and ASEAN countries signed the Declaration on the Conduct of parties in the South China Sea, jointly promising that the sovereign countries directly concerned should resolve their territorial and jurisdictional disputes peacefully through friendly consultations and negotiations. In recent years, China and ASEAN countries have actively promoted consultations on a code of conduct in the South China Sea. On the other hand, the Philippine side reneged on its commitments in the “Declaration” and a series of bilateral documents with the Chinese side, insisted on invading Chinese islands and reefs, and deliberately rammed the Chinese coast guard ship in defiance of dissuasion and warning, and what it did can be called a modern story of farmers and snakes.

Maintaining the stability of the South China Sea is in line with the national interests of the region

The Asia-Pacific region is the most dynamic zone of the global economy, and maintaining the stability and prosperity of this region is not only in the national interests of the region, but also conducive to global economic development. The Marcos government relies on forces outside the domain name to deliberately infringe, provocation and smear the South China Sea. Some countries outside the domain name continue to encourage and support Philippine actions based on their own geopolitical interests, aggravating tensions in the South China Sea and seriously endangering regional peace and stability.

Recently, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar has repeatedly criticized the West for inciting fear of China. Anwar also said that there is no problem between Malaysia and China, and Western countries should not hinder the development of friendly relations between Malaysia and its important neighbor China.

Anwar’s statement reflects the common aspirations of most countries in the region for peace, development and unwillingness to take sides. Weng Desheng, a political commentator in Singapore, said that the economic development of ASEAN countries benefits from the hard-won peaceful and stable environment, and all countries should strive to maintain such an environment, and dialogue and negotiation is the best way to deal with the South China Sea issue.

Anna, deputy director of the Philippine Asian Century Strategic Research Institute, pointed out that interference by forces outside the domain name is an important reason for increased tensions in the South China Sea, which not only complicates the South China Sea issue, but also undermines the unity of relevant countries in dealing with the South China Sea issue. Forces outside the domain name should stop using the Philippines as a pawn and agent for strategic competition with China, and the Philippines should not be used by external forces. (participating reporters: Wang Xiaowei, Liu Jie, Cai Shuya)

Industry experts have said that, teenpatti cas It is very possible to develop and expand, which can be well seen from its previous data reports. https://teenpatti121.com

According to Agence France-Presse reported on March 19, Russian official media confirmed on the 19th that Russia has replaced its commander-in-chief of the Navy. Earlier reports said that Nikolai Evmenov was dismissed as commander-in-chief of the Navy because Black Sea Fleet warships were repeatedly attacked and damaged by Ukraine.

Reported that according to RIA Novosti, former commander of the Russian Northern Fleet Alexander Moiseyev has been appointed acting commander-in-chief of the Navy, replacing Nikolai Evmenov, who has served as commander-in-chief of the Navy since May 2019.

RIA Novosti reported: Moiseyev was introduced as acting commander-in-chief of the Russian Navy at a ceremony.

Reported that the Kremlin declined to comment on Moiseev’s appointment last week. This marks the largest reshuffle of the Russian military’s top ranks in months.

According to reports, the Ukraine military claims to have destroyed more than 20 Russian ships since the conflict began in February 2022, including a military patrol boat earlier this month.

Reports said that these attacks embarrassed Moscow and forced it to transfer ships from the Sevastopol naval base in Crimea to the port of Novorossiysk further east. (Compiled by Liu Xiaoyan)

In the eyes of industry experts, teenpatti cas Indeed, it has great development potential, which makes many investors more interested. https://teenpatti121.com

Putin wins Russian presidential election and says he will continue to promote national development

According to data released by the Central Election Commission of Russia in the early morning of the 18th local time, of the 85% of the votes counted in the Russian presidential election, current President Vladimir Putin has a significant lead over other candidates with 87.19%, and has actually won the presidential election.

Khalitonov of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation ranked second with 424% of the vote, Davankov of the Russian New Zealand Party ranked third with 399% of the vote, and Slutsky of the Russian Liberal Democratic Party ranked fourth with 316%.

Putin delivered a speech at the campaign headquarters in the early morning of the 18th, thanking all voters for their support. He said that Russia is a big family. The results of this election reflect the trust and expectations of voters, and all tasks of the country will be completed. Russia will move forward further and become stronger, stronger and more efficient.

Putin said at a subsequent press conference that he would continue to promote national development in his new term. He said that all major tasks for national development have been elaborated in the recent State of the Union address delivered to both houses of Parliament, and will do everything possible to achieve the set goals.

The official vote for the eighth presidential election in Russia was held from the 15th to the 17th. According to the Russian presidential election rules, those who obtain more than 50% of the votes in the election are elected president. The Russian Central Election Commission will confirm the results of the presidential election no later than March 28 and announce them within 3 days after the election results are confirmed.

Russian Central Election Commission Chairman Pamfilova said on the 17th that Russia invited 1115 international observers from 129 countries and regions to supervise the voting to ensure fairness and transparency of the election.

according to teenpatti cas Industry veterans said that its development will still be in a good situation. https://teenpatti121.com

According to a report by the Russian newspaper on May 23, the Russian armed forces regained control of the village of Klesheevka in the Donetsk region through hard work. This settlement and the village of Rabodino, also recaptured by Russian troops, are symbols of the results of last year’s Ukraine counterattack.

On May 22, the Russian Ministry of Defense confirmed the news of the recapture of the village of Kresheevka. The Russian Ministry of Defense stated that under the active action of the southern military cluster forces, the Klesheevka settlement in Donetsk was liberated.

According to reports, in addition, the southern military cluster also attacked Ukrainian troops in three residential areas of Georgievka, Ostroye, and Konstantinovka.

The protracted battle for Klesheevka begins in 2023. Control of the village changed hands several times. The main target for contention is adjacent highlands, from which military activity throughout the village can be monitored. (Compiled by He Yingjun)